




Table of Contents Page
2......... Project Information
2.3
Construction
Programme and Activities
2.5
Status
of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits
3......... Environmental Monitoring Requirements
3.1
Construction
Dust Monitoring
3.2
Construction
Noise Monitoring
4......... Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
5.1
Construction
Dust Monitoring
5.2
Regular
Construction Noise Monitoring
6......... ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION AND AUDIT
7......... Environmental Non-conformance
7.1
Summary
of Monitoring Exceedances
7.2
Summary
of Environmental Non-Compliance
7.3
Summary
of Environmental Complaints
7.4
Summary
of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecutions
8.1
Construction
Programme for the Next Three Months
8.2
Key
Issues for the Coming Month
8.3
Monitoring
Schedule for the Coming Month
9......... ConclusionS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
List of Tables
Table 2.1......... Construction
Activities in the reporting month
Table 2.2......... Contact
Information of Key Personnel
Table 2.3......... Status of
Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits
Table 3.2 ........ Location of
Construction Dust Monitoring Station
Table 3.3 ........ Noise Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Table 3.5 ........ Noise Monitoring
Stations during Construction Phase
Table 4.1......... Status of Required
Submission under Environmental Permit
Table 6.1 ........ Observations and
Recommendations of Site Audit
Table 8.1......... Construction
Activities in the coming month
List of Figures
|
Site Layout Plan |
|
|
Location of Air Quality Monitoring Station |
|
|
Locations of Noise Monitoring Station |
List of Appendices
|
Construction Programme |
|
|
Project Organization Structure |
|
|
Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures |
|
|
Summary of Action and Limit Levels |
|
|
Event and Action Plan |
|
|
Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
|
|
Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table |
Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak West (CKR-KTW; Contract No. HY/2014/07) (hereafter called “the Project”) covers part of the construction of the Central Kowloon Route (CKR).
The Project comprises the follow works:
·
50x30m access shaft with noise enclosure at
Ma Tau Kok (MTK);
·
100m long cut-and-cover (C&C) tunnel at MTK;
·
Demolition and re-provisioning of MTK Public Pier;
·
160m long underwater tunnel (UWT) (Stage 1);
·
210m long UWT (Stage 2);
·
60m long C&C tunnel at Kai Tak;
·
130m long depressed road and 200m long
underpass at Kai Tak;
·
390m long underground tunnel ventilation
audit at Kai Tak;
·
Seawall demolition and construction of new
landing steps; and
·
Barging Point enclosure and conveyor system.
All
construction works of Contract No. HY/2014/07 Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak
West (FEP-01/457/2013/C) are substantially completed in September 2025. The
proposal of termination of the EM&A Programme under FEP-01/457/2013/C will be submitted in
November 2025 for approval.
The EM&A programme commenced on 4 April 2018.The
impact EM&A for the Project includes air quality and noise monitoring. The EM&A monitoring,
including both construction dust monitoring (monitoring station E-A14a) and
construction noise monitoring (monitoring station E-N12a and E-N21a) will be
conducted by Contract No. HY/2023/08 Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works
under EP-457/2013/D from 1 October 2025.
This is the 91st
monthly EM&A Report presenting the EM&A works carried out during the
period between 1 and 31 October 2025. As informed by the Contractor, major
activities in the reporting period were:
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect
rectification works at Public Transport Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Road stud
installation at Underwater Tunnel. |
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
The
EM&A monitoring, including both construction dust monitoring (monitoring
station E-A14a) will be conducted by Contract No. HY/2023/08 Central Kowloon
Route – Remaining Works under EP-457/2013/D from 1 October 2025. Details of the
corresponding monitoring results, and wind data, could be referred to Sections
3 of the corresponding Monthly EM&A Report for Contract No. HY/2023/08.
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Noise
Regular
Noise Monitoring
The EM&A monitoring, construction
noise monitoring (monitoring station E-N12a and E-N21a) will be conducted by
Contract No. HY/2023/08 Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works under
EP-457/2013/D from 1 October 2025. Details of the corresponding monitoring
results could be referred to Sections 3 of the corresponding Monthly EM&A
Report for Contract No. HY/2023/08.
One (1)
action level exceedance was recorded regarding to
complaint on noise nuisance received in the reporting month. No limit level
exceedance was recorded at all monitoring stations in the reporting month.
Complaint, Notification of Summons and Successful
Prosecution
One (1)
complaint was received in the reporting month (October 2025). The complaint was
investigated and investigation report was provided in
this reporting month (October 2025).
Reporting Changes
No report changes in the
reporting period.
Future Key Issues
Key issues to be considered in the next month included:
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect rectification works at Public Transport
Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Block paving outside Kowloon City Public Pier |
·
Section 1: Introduction
·
Section 2: Project Information
·
Section 3: Environmental Monitoring
Requirement
·
Section 4: Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation Measures
·
Section 5: Monitoring Results
·
Section 6: Environmental Site Inspection and
Audit
·
Section 7: Environmental
Non-conformance
·
Section 8: Future Key Issues
· Section 9: Conclusions and Recommendations
(a) construction of approximately 160m long cut-and-cover tunnel and 370m long underwater tunnel between the tunnel section at Ma Tau Kok and the depressed road of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;
(b) reconstruction of the seawall at Ma Tau Kok public pier, and the sloping seawall at the Former Kai Tak Airport Runway;
(c) construction of approximately 125m long depressed road and 200m long underpass of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;
(d) construction of approximately 360m long underground tunnel ventilation adit of the CKR;
(e) reconstruction of Kowloon City Ferry Pier Public Transport Interchange; and
(f) other associated works.
Table 2.1
Construction Activities in the reporting month
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect
rectification works at Public Transport Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Road stud
installation at Underwater Tunnel. |
Table 2.2
Contact Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Role |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
Fax |
|
Arup-Mott MacDonald Joint Venture |
Residential Engineer (ER) |
Engineer’s Representative |
Mr. Patrick Lo |
36195901 |
2268 3954 |
|
ERM |
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) |
Independent Environmental Checker |
Ms. Mandy To |
2271 3113 |
3015 8052 |
|
Gammon |
Contractor |
Contracts Manager |
Mr. Kin Fai Tam |
2516 8823 |
2516 6260 |
|
Environmental Manager |
Ms. Michelle Tang |
9267 8866 |
2516 6260 |
||
|
AECOM |
Contractor’s Environmental Team (ET) |
ET Leader |
Mr. Y. W. Fung |
3856 5681 |
2317 7609 |
Table 2.3
Status of Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits
|
Permit / License No. / Notification/ Reference No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
Remarks |
|
|
From |
To |
|||
|
Further Environmental Permit |
||||
|
FEP-01/457/2013/C |
28 Feb 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
Wastewater Discharge License |
||||
|
WT00043692-2023 |
1 Apr 2023 |
31 Mar 2028 |
Valid |
Ma Tau Kok |
|
WT00043881-2023 |
30 Jun 2023 |
30 Jun 2028 |
Valid |
Underwater Tunnel Stage 2 |
|
WT00044013-2023 |
7 May 2025 |
30 Apr 2028 |
Valid |
Kai Tak and Underwater Tunnel Stage 1 |
|
Construction Noise Permit |
||||
|
GW-RE0157-25 |
7 Mar 2025 |
6 Sep 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Ma Tau Kok |
|
GW-RE0631-25 |
15 Jun 2025 |
14 Dec 2025 |
Valid |
General Works at Kai Tak |
|
GW-RE0418-25 |
30 Apr 2025 |
29 Oct 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
General Works at Stage 1 Underwater Tunnel |
|
GW-RE0581-25 |
7 Jun 2025 |
6 Nov 2025 |
Valid |
General Works at Stage 2 Underwater Tunnel |
|
GW-RE0233-25 |
19 Mar 2025 |
18 Sep 2025 |
No further renewal by KTW |
Kai Tak Access Road |
|
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
||||
|
5118-247-G2347-47 |
30 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
5118-247-G2347-48 |
30 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
Marine Dumping Permit |
||||
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
Billing Account for Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
|
7029909 |
22 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Account Active |
-- |
|
Notification Under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
|
429442 |
5 Jan 2018 |
End of Project |
Notified |
-- |
|
|
||||
Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring Equipment
Table 3.2
Location of Construction Dust
Monitoring Station
|
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
|
E-A14a [1] |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
[1] The air monitoring station proposed in
the EM&A Manual (i.e. Wyler Gardens with ID: E-A14) was not available for
impact dust monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was conducted at E-A14a as
an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.
Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
Monitoring Requirements
Table 3.3
Noise Monitoring Parameters,
Frequency and Duration
|
Parameter and Duration |
Frequency |
|
30-mins measurement at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and L90 would be recorded. |
At least once per week |
Monitoring Locations
Table 3.5
Noise Monitoring Stations during
Construction Phase
|
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Measurement |
|
E-N12a [1] |
19 Hing Yan Street |
Rooftop (9/F) |
Façade |
|
E-N21a [1] |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
Free field[2] |
Notes:
[1] The noise monitoring stations proposed in the EM&A Manual
(i.e. Grand Waterfront Tower 3 with ID: E-N12 and Hang Chien Court Block J with
ID: E-N21) were not available for impact noise monitoring, therefore impact
monitoring was conducted at E-N12a and E-N21a as an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.
[2] A correction of +3 dB(A) was made
to the free field measurements.
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring Methodology
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
Table 4.1
Status of Required Submission under Environmental Permit
|
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
|
Condition
3.4 of |
Monthly EM&A Report for September 2025 |
14 October 2025 |
Table 6.1
Observations and Recommendations of
Site Audit
|
Parameters |
Date |
Observations and Recommendations |
Follow-up |
|
Air Quality |
2 October 2025 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded to provide watering at
MTK pier. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 15 October 2025. |
|
8 October 2025 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded to clean the muddy tire
track on the public road at stage 2 marine platform. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 15 October 2025. |
|
|
8 October 2025 |
Reminder: The road roller was missing NRMM label at stage 2
marine platform. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 16 October 2025. |
|
|
Noise |
2 October 2025 |
Reminder: The hand held breaker was
missing the NEL at MTK. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 9 October 2025. |
|
Water Quality |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Waste/ Chemical Management |
22 October 2025 |
Reminder: The
contractor was advised to provide tarpaulin sheet for the breaker head to
prevent oil leakage to the ground. |
The item was rectified by the Contractor on 22 October 2025. |
|
Landscape & Visual |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Permits/ Licenses |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
*The item was under rectification on last reporting month.
Table 8.1
Construction Activities in the coming month
|
Locations |
Site Activities |
|
Kai Tak |
- Defect rectification works at depressed road; |
|
Ma Tau Kok |
- Defect rectification works at Public Transport
Interchange |
|
Kowloon Bay |
- Block paving outside Kowloon City Public Pier |
Document prepared by:
Unit 1608, 16/F, Tower B,
Manulife Financial Centre
223 -231 Wai Yip Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong
Kong.
|
T |
3664 6888 |
A person using
a)
Using the documents or data
in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy
b)
Using the documents or data
for any purpose not agreed to in writing by
c)
against the original hard
copy version.
|
Document control |
|
|||||
|
Report title |
Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit – Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck – Report No. 12 (Period from 1st to 31st October 2025) |
|||||
|
Document code |
|
Project number |
P528199 |
|||
|
File path |
|
|||||
|
Client |
|
|||||
|
Client contact |
|
Client reference |
|
|||
|
Rev |
Date |
Revision details/status |
Author |
Reviewer |
Verifier |
Approver |
|
0 |
|
First
issue |
Kisten
Ma |
F.C.
Tsang |
|
F.C.
Tsang |
|
1 |
|
Second
Issue |
Kisten
Ma |
F.C.
Tsang |
|
F.C.
Tsang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current revision |
|
|||||
|
Approval |
|||
|
Author signature |
|
Approver signature |
|
|
Name |
Kisten Ma |
Name |
F.C. Tsang |
|
Title |
Senior Consultant |
Title |
Environmental Team Leader |
3 Air Quality and Noise Monitoring
6 Summary of Complaints, Notification of Summons and
Prosecutions
9 Conclusion and Recommendations
Appendices
Appendix A Alignment and Works Site in Kai Tak West
Area for Contract No. HY/2023/08
Appendix B Construction
Programme
Appendix C Project Organization Chart
Appendix D Event and Action Plan (EAP) (Air Quality Monitoring)
Appendix E Event and Action
Plan (EAP) (Noise Monitoring)
Appendix F Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
Appendix G Location Plan of Air Quality and Noise
Monitoring Station
Appendix H Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
and Coming Month
Appendix I Calibration Certificates for Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Appendix J Air Quality Monitoring Results and their
Graphical Presentations
Appendix K Calibration Certificates for Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Appendix L Noise Monitoring Results and their
Graphical Presentations
Appendix M Waste Flow Table
Appendix N Statistics on
Complaint, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
1.1.1
Build King -
Tung Lee Joint Venture (“Contractor”) commenced the construction works of
Highway Department (HyD) Central Kowloon Route Contract No. HY/2023/08 –
Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works at Kai Tak West Area (“The Project”) on
11 November 2024. This is the 12th
monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) report presenting the
EM&A works carried out in the Kai Tak West Area during the period from 1 October 2025 to 31 October 2025.
1.1.2
A summary of
major construction activities informed by the Contractor for the Project during
the reporting period is presented below.
|
Construction
Activities Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
|
·
Backfilling, drainage
layer and waterproofing works at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Ramp construction at Kai
Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Planter soil laying and shrub
planting at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck ·
Drainage system and installation
of irrigation pipe and ducting for cabling works at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck ·
Finishes (floor &
wall) at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Works
1.1.3
Regular construction air quality monitoring
(24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP) and noise monitoring activities in the reporting
month is summarised in below:
l
Construction Air Quality Monitoring (24-hour
TSP and 1-hour TSP x 3 times)
- At Monitoring Station E-A14a on 2, 8,
14, 20, 25 and 31 October 2025
l
Construction Noise Monitoring during normal
working hours
- At Monitoring Station E-N12a and EN-21a on 2, 8,
14, 20, 25 and 31 October 2025
1.1.4
Joint weekly site inspections were conducted
by representatives of the Environmental team (ET), the Contractor and the
Engineer on 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31 October 2025. A
joint site inspection with the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) was
undertaken on 17 October 2025. Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of
landscape and visual mitigation measures was conducted by the ET on 3, 17 and
31 October 2025. Details of the audit findings and
implementation status are presented in Section 7. Details of waste management are presented in Section
4.
1.1.5
A summary of the non-compliance (exceedance)
during the reporting period is provided below.
l Air
quality Monitoring
- No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 1-hour
TSP was recorded.
- No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 24-hour
TSP was recorded.
l Noise
Monitoring
- No Action / Limit Level exceedance for
construction noise was recorded.
Complaints, Notification of Summons and
Successful Prosecution
1.1.6
No environmental related complaints,
notification of summons and successful prosecution were received in the
reporting period.
Reporting Changes
1.1.7
There were no reporting changes during the
reporting period.
Future Key Issues
1.1.8
A summary of construction activities informed
by the Contractor for the next reporting period are listed below:
|
Construction
Activities To be Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
|
· Ramp construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck · Finishes (floor & wall) at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck · EM&A works at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck ·
Staircase
Construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
1.1.1
Central Kowloon Route (CKR) is a 4.7 km long
dual 3-lane trunk road in Central Kowloon linking Yau Ma Tei Interchange in
West Kowloon with the road network on Kai Tak Development and Kowloon Bay in
East Kowloon.
1.1.2
The Central Kowloon Route – Design and
Construction Environmental Impact Assessment Report (Register No.:
AEIAR-171/2013) was approved with conditions by the Environmental Protection
Department (EPD) on 11 July 2013. An Environmental Permit (EP-457/2013) was
issued on 9 August 2013. Variations
of EP (VEP) was subsequently applied for and the latest EP (EP-457/2013/D) was
issued by EPD on 15 June 2021.
1.1.3
The construction of the CKR had been divided
into different sections. Contract No.
HY/2023/08 – Central Kowloon Route – Remaining Works covers part of the
construction activities located at Kai Tak West Area and Yau Ma Tei Area under
the EP, including:
l design
and construction of landscaping works at Yau Ma Tei Landscaped Deck, Yau Ma Tei
Rest Gardens, North Tree Park and Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck;
l improvement
of a section of Kai Fuk Road of approximately 300 metres in length;
l planting
of compensatory trees; and
l associated
civil works, electrical and mechanical works, road and drainage works, lighting
works and establishment works.
1.1.4
The works site at Kai Tak West Area for the
Contract No. HY/2023/08 are shown in Appendix A.
1.2
Purpose of
the Report
1.2.1
This is the 12th
monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) report presenting the
EM&A works carried out for the Project in the Kai Tak West Area during the
period from 1 October 2025 to 31 October 2025.
1.3
Construction
Activities Undertaken During the Reporting Period
1.3.1
A summary of major construction activities carried
out during the reporting period are presented in Table 1.1. The construction programme is presented in Appendix
B.
Table 1.1 Summary of
Construction Activities during the Reporting Period
|
Construction Activities Undertaken in Kai
Tak West Area |
Progress |
|
·
Planter
Wall construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
100% |
|
·
Backfilling,
drainage layer and waterproofing works at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
100% |
|
·
Ramp
construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
90% |
|
·
Planter
soil laying and shrub planting at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
100% |
|
·
Drainage
system and installation of irrigation pipe and ducting for cabling works at
Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
60% |
|
·
Finishes
(floor & wall) at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
40% |
1.4
Project
Organisation
1.4.1
The project organization structure is shown
in Appendix C. The key personnel contact names and numbers for the
Project are summarized in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Contact Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Role |
Position |
Name |
Contact No. |
|
Arup – Mott
MacDonald Joint Venture |
Engineer’s
Representative (“ER”) |
Resident Engineer
(Environmental) |
Ms. Jim Li |
9120 1157 |
|
ERM – Hong Kong
Limited |
Independent
Environmental Checker (“IEC”) |
IEC |
Ms. Mandy To |
2271 3313 |
|
Aurecon Hong Kong
Limited |
Environmental
Team (“ET”) |
ET Leader |
Mr. F.C. Tsang |
3664 6801 |
|
Build King – Tung
Lee Joint Venture |
Contractor |
Environmental
Officer |
Mr. Tony Tsoi |
9689 8956 |
1.5
Status of Environmental Licences,
Notification and Permit
1.5.1
A summary of the valid permits, licences,
and/ or notifications on environmental protection for this Project is presented
in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3 Summary of the Environmental Licence,
Notification, Permit and Documentations
|
Permit/ License/ Notification /
Reference No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
Remark |
||
|
From |
To |
|
|
||
|
Environmental
Permit |
|||||
|
EP-457/2013/D |
15 June 2021 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Wastewater
Discharge License |
|||||
|
WT00046473-2025 |
9 May 2025 |
End of Project |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Notification of
Construction Works Under the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust
Regulation) |
|||||
|
10007346 |
25 July 2024 |
End of Project |
Notified |
-- |
|
|
Chemical Waste
Producer Registration |
|||||
|
5213-286-B2767-02 |
19 March 2025 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Billing Account
for Disposal of Construction Waste |
|||||
|
7051793 |
6 August 2024 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Y-Park Membership |
|||||
|
C0280 |
12 August 2024 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
|
Construction Noise
Permit |
|||||
|
GW-RE1157-25 |
25 September 2025 |
21 March 2026 |
Valid |
General
Activities at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
|
|
Collection of
Public Fill at Public Fill Reception Facility |
|||||
|
TKO137-HY/2023/08-02 |
1 July 2025 |
31 December 2025 |
Valid |
-- |
|
2.1
Environmental Permit (EP) Submission
Status
2.1.1
Environmental permit (EP) conditions under
the EIAO, submission status under the EP and implementation status of
mitigation measures had been reviewed and implemented on schedule. The status of required submissions under the
EP (EP-457/2013/D) during the reporting period for the Project are summarised
in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Summary of
Status of Required Submission for EP-457/2013/D for the Project
|
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
|
3.4 |
Monthly
EM&A Report – Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscape Deck (September 2025) |
14 October 2025 |
3
Air Quality and
Noise Monitoring
3.1
Air Quality
Monitoring
Requirements
3.1.1
In accordance with the approved EM&A
Manual, measurement of 24-hour and 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP)
level at the designated air quality monitoring station is required. Impact
24-hour TSP monitoring should be carried out for at least once every 6 days,
and 1-hour TSP monitoring should be done at least 3 times every 6 days while
the highest dust impact is expected.
Monitoring Equipment
3.1.2
24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was
performed using High Volume Sampler (HVS) located at the designated monitoring
station. The HVS meets all the requirements of the EM&A Manual. A portable
direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring.
3.1.3
A summary of the equipment that was deployed
for the air quality monitoring is shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Air Quality
Monitoring Equipment
|
Monitoring Parameter |
Monitoring
Equipment |
Serial Number
|
Date of
calibration |
|
24-hour TSP |
High Volume Sampler |
1087 |
29 September 2025 |
|
Calibration Kit |
4166 |
8 May 2025 |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
Digital Dust Indicator |
467356 |
15 August 2025 |
|
467359 |
15 August 2025 |
Monitoring Locations
3.1.4
The monitoring station for air quality
monitoring pertinent to the Project has been identified based on the approved
EM&A Manual for the Project. The
location of the air quality monitoring station is summarized in Table 3.2 and shown in
Appendix G.
Table 3.2 Air Quality
Monitoring Station
|
Location I.D. |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
|
E-A14a (1) |
Block B of Merit Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
|
Note: (1) The air monitoring station proposed in the
EM&A Manual (i.e. Wyler Gardens with ID: E-A14) was not available for
impact dust monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was conducted at E-A14a
as an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD. |
||
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC
3.1.5
24-hour TSP Monitoring
l The
HVS was installed in the vicinity of the air sensitive receivers. The following criteria were considered in the
installation of the HVS as far as practicable: -
- A horizontal platform with appropriate
support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.
- Two samplers should not be placed less than
2m apart from each other.
- The distance between the HVS and any
obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle
protrudes above the HVS.
- A minimum of 2 meters separation from walls,
parapets and penthouse for rooftop sampler.
- A minimum of 2 meters separation from any
supporting structure, measured horizontally is required.
- No furnace or incinerator flues nearby.
- Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.
- The sampler was located more than 20 meters
from any dripline.
- Any wire fence and gate, required to protect
the sampler, did not obstruct the monitoring process.
- Permission was obtained to set up the
samplers and access to the monitoring station.
- A secured supply of electricity was obtained
to operate the sampler.
l Preparation of Filter Paper
- Glass fibre filters, G810 were labelled and
sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.
- All filters were equilibrated in the
conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning
environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C;
the relative humidity (RH) was < 50% and not variable by more than ±5%. A
convenient working RH was 40%.
- All filter papers were prepared and analysed
by Acumen Laboratory and Testing Limited, which is a HOKLAS accredited
laboratory and has comprehensive quality assurance and quality control
programmes.
l Field Monitoring
- The power supply was checked to ensure the
HVS works properly.
- The filter holder and the area surrounding
the filter were cleaned.
- The filter holder was removed by loosening
the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting
screen was aligned carefully.
- The filter was properly aligned on the screen
so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
- The swing bolts were fastened to hold the
filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied was sufficient to avoid
air leakage at the edges.
- Then the shelter lid was closed and was
secured with the aluminium strip.
- The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to
establish run-temperature conditions.
- A new flow rate record sheet was set into the
flow recorder.
- On site temperature and atmospheric pressure
readings were taken and the flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at
around 1.3 m3/min, and complied with the range
specified in the EM&A Manual (i.e. 0.6-1.7 m3/min).
- The programmable digital timer was set for a
sampling period of 24 hrs, and the starting time, weather condition and the
filter number were recorded.
- The initial elapsed time was recorded.
- At the end of sampling, on site temperature
and atmospheric pressure readings were taken and the final flow rate of the HVS
was checked and recorded.
- The final elapsed time was recorded.
- The sampled filter was removed carefully and
folded in half length so that only surfaces with
collected particulate matter were in contact.
- It was then placed in a clean envelope and
sealed.
- All monitoring information was recorded on a
standard data sheet.
- Filters were then sent to Acumen
Laboratory and Testing Limited for analysis.
l Maintenance and Calibration
- The HVS and its accessories were maintained
in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and
checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.
- HVSs were calibrated using TE-5025A
Calibration Kit upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals.
- Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A
Calibration Kit and the HVSs are provided in Appendix I.
l Wind Data Monitoring
-
The wind
speed has been recorded from Hong Kong Observatory- King’s Park meteorological
station, along with portable wind speed meter stand by as back up when the
information is not available from HKO.
3.1.6
1-hour TSP Monitoring
l The
measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the
Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
- Turn the power on.
- Close the air collecting opening cover.
- Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG]
- Push “START/STOP” switch to perform
background measurement for 6 seconds.
- Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert
the light scattering plate.
- Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN
CHECK” is indicated in the display.
- Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic
sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.
- Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE
position.
- Push the “TIME SETTING” switch the time set
in the display to 3 hours.
- Lower down the air collection opening cover.
- Push “START/STOP” switch to start
measurement.
l Maintenance and Calibration
-
The 1-hour
TSP meter was calibrated at 1-year intervals against a High
Volume Sampler. Calibration certificates of the Laser
Dust Monitors are provided in Appendix I.
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
3.1.7
The schedule for impact air quality
monitoring in October 2025 is provided in Appendix H.
Monitoring Results
3.1.8
The monitoring results for 24-hour TSP and
1-hour TSP are summarized in Table 3.3 and Table 3.4 respectively.
Detailed air quality monitoring results and daily extract of
meteorological observations are presented in Appendix J.
Table 3.3 Summary of
24-hour TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period
|
Location I.D. |
Range |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level |
|
E-A14a |
20 –
50 |
197.3 |
260 |
Table 3.4 Summary of 1-hour
TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period
|
Location I.D. |
Range |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level |
|
E-A14a |
41 –
69 |
302.4 |
500 |
3.1.9
Major dust sources during the monitoring
included construction dust and nearby traffic emission.
Observations
3.1.10
No Action/ Limit Level exceedance was
recorded for all 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP monitoring at the monitoring
location in the reporting period.
3.1.11
The event and action plan are annexed in Appendix
D.
3.1.12
Site audits were carried out on a weekly
basis to monitor and audit the timely implementation of air quality mitigation
measures within the site boundaries of this Project. A summary of observation during the site
audits is shown in Table 7.1 of
this report.
3.2
Noise
Monitoring Requirements
3.2.1
In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact noise monitoring should
be conducted for at least once a week during the construction phase of the
Project. Table 3.5 summaries the monitoring
parameters, frequency and duration of impact noise monitoring.
Table 3.5 Noise
Monitoring Parameter, Frequency and Duration
|
Parameter and Duration |
Frequency |
|
30-mins measurement at
each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and L90 would
be recorded. |
At least once per week |
Monitoring Equipment
3.2.2
Noise monitoring was performed using sound
level meter at each designated monitoring station. The sound level meters
deployed comply with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications
(IEC) 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Acoustic
calibrator was deployed to check the sound level meters at a known sound
pressure level. A summary of equipment is given in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6 Summary
of Noise Monitoring Equipment
|
Equipment |
Manufacturer and Model |
Serial Number |
Date of calibration |
|
Sound Level Meter |
NTi XL3 |
A3A-01230-F0 |
9 June 2026 |
|
A3A-01235-F0 |
12 May 2026 |
||
|
Acoustic Calibrator |
RION NC-75 |
A3A-01235-F0 |
12 May 2026 |
Monitoring Locations
3.2.3
The monitoring stations for construction
noise monitoring pertinent to the Project have been identified based on the
approved EM&A Manual for the Project. Locations of the noise
monitoring stations are summarized in Table 3.7 and
shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.7 Noise
Monitoring Station for Construction Phase
|
Location I.D. |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Measurement |
|
E-N12a (1) |
19 Hing Yan Street |
Rooftop (9/F) |
Façade |
|
E-N21a |
Block B of Merit
Industrial Centre |
Rooftop (13/F) |
Free-field (2) |
|
Note: (1)
The noise
monitoring stations proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e. Grand Waterfront
Tower 3 with ID: E-N12 and Hang Chien Court Block J with ID: E-N21) were not
available for impact noise monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was
conducted at E-N12a and E-N21a as an alternative which was agreed by the ER,
IEC and EPD. (2)
A
correction of +3 dB(A) was made to the free-field measurements. |
|||
Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC
l Monitoring Procedures
- The sound level meter was set on a tripod at
a height of 1.2 m above the ground.
- Façade measurement was made at E-N12a.
- Free field measurements was
made at monitoring location E-N21a. A correction of +3 dB(A) shall be made to
the free field measurements.
- The battery condition was checked
to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
- Parameters such as frequency weighting, the
time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
§ frequency weighting
§ time weighting: Fast
§ time measurement: Leq(30-minutes)
during non-restricted hours i.e. 0700 – 1900 on normal weekdays.
- Prior to and after each noise measurement,
the meter was calibrated using the acoustic calibrator for 94 dB(A) at 1000
Hz. If the difference in the calibration
level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB(A), the measurement would
be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after
re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
- During the monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 were
recorded. In addition, site conditions
and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
- Noise measurement was paused during periods
of high intrusive noise (e.g. dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible.
Observations were recorded when intrusive noise was unavoidable.
- Noise monitoring was cancelled in the
presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5m/s, or wind with
gusts exceeding 10m/s.
l Maintenance and Calibration
- The microphone head of the sound
level meter was cleaned with soft cloth at regular intervals.
- The meter and calibrator were sent to the
supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.
- Calibration certificates of
the sound level meters and acoustic
calibrators are provided in Appendix K.
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
3.2.4
The schedule for impact air quality
monitoring in October 2025 is provided in Appendix H.
Monitoring Results
3.2.5
The monitoring results for noise are
summarized in Table 3.8 and
the monitoring data is provided in Appendix L.
Table 3.8 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
|
Location I.D. |
Range, dB(A),
Leq (30 mins) |
Limit Level, Leq (30 mins) |
|
E-N12a |
57.2
– 69.4 |
75.0 |
|
E-N21a |
62.9
– 64.9 (1) |
75.0 |
|
Note: (1) A correction of +3 dB(A) was made to the
free-field measurements. |
||
3.2.6
Major noise sources during the monitoring
included construction noise from the nearby construction and nearby traffic
noise.
Observations
3.2.7
No Action/ Limit Level exceedance was
recorded for construction noise monitoring in the reporting period.
3.2.8
Site audits were carried out on a weekly
basis to monitor and audit the timely implementation of noise mitigation
measures within the site boundaries of this Project. A summary of observations during the site
audits is shown in Table 7.1 of
this report.
4
Waste Management
4.1.1
Waste generated from this Project includes
inert C&D materials and non-inert C&D materials. Non-inert C&D
materials are made up of general refuse, vegetative wastes and recyclable
wastes such as plastics and paper/ cardboard packaging waste. Steel materials generated from the project are
also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as the materials were not
disposed of with other inert C&D materials. As
advised by the Contractor, only general refuse was generated and disposed of
during this reporting period.
4.1.2
With reference to relevant handling records
and trip tickets of this Project, the quantities of different types of waste
generated in the reporting period are summarised in Table 4.1. Details of cumulative waste management data are
presented as a waste flow table in Appendix M.
Table 4.1 Quantities of Waste Generated
from the Project in the Reporting Period
|
Reporting period |
Quantity |
|||||
|
Inert C&D
Materials (in ‘000 kg) |
Chemical
Waste (in ‘kg) |
Non-inert
C&D Materials |
||||
|
Others, e.g. General Refuse disposed of at
Landfill (in ‘000kg) |
Recycled
materials |
|||||
|
Paper/ cardboard (in ‘000kg) |
Plastics (in ‘000 kg) |
Metals (in ‘000 kg) |
||||
|
October 2025 |
119.55 |
0.00 |
29.82 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
5.1.1
As per the EM&A Manuals, the landscape
and visual mitigation measures shall be implemented, and site inspections
should be undertaken once every two weeks during the construction period.
5.1.2
Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of
landscape and visual mitigation measures was conducted on 3, 17 and
31 October 2025. The observations and recommendations made
during the site inspections are presented in Table 7.1. A summary of the implementation status is
presented in Appendix F.
6
Summary of
Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
6.1.1
The environmental Complaints Handling
Procedures is shown below.
|
Complaint
Received via Project Hotline |
Complaint Received via 1823 or from other government departments |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractor notify ER, ET
and IEC |
ER notify Contractor, ET
and IEC |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Contractor log
complaint and date of receipt onto the complaint database. Contractor, ER and ET to conduct investigation of complaint |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
If complaint is
considered not valid |
If complaint is found
valid |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
ET or ER to reply to the
complainant if necessary |
Contractor
to identify and implement remedial measures in consultation with the IEC, ET
and ER. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
The ER, ET and IEC to review the effectiveness of the Contractor’s
remedial measures and the updated situation; ET to undertake additional monitoring and
audit to verify the situation if necessary and oversee that circumstances
leading to the complaint do not recur. ER to conduct further
inspection as necessary. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
If the
complaint is referred by the EPD, the Contractor to prepare interim report on
the status of the complaint investigation and follow-up actions stipulated
above, including the details of the remedial measures and additional
monitoring identified or already taken, for submission to EPD within the
timeframe assigned by the EPD |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The ET to
record the details of the complaint, results of the investigation, subsequent
actions taken to address the complaint and updated situation including the
effectiveness of the remedial measures, supported by regular and additional
monitoring results in the monthly EM&A reports |
|||||
6.1.2
Should non-compliance of the criteria occur,
action in accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Appendix D and Appendix
E shall be carried out.
6.1.3
No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels
of air quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) monitoring and noise monitoring was
recorded in the reporting period.
6.1.4
No complaint was received in the reporting period.
6.1.5
No non-compliance was received in the
reporting period.
6.1.6
No notification of summons and successful
prosecution was received in the reporting period.
6.1.7
Statistics on complaints, notifications of
summons and successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix N.
7.1.1
Site inspections were carried out on a weekly
basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control
and mitigation measures under the Contract. In the reporting period, 5 site
inspections were carried out by the representative
of ET, Contractor and Engineer on 3, 10, 17, 24
and 31 October 2025, along with bi-weekly
inspection of the implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures
conducted on 3, 17 and 31 October 2025.
7.1.2
One joint site inspection with the IEC was
also undertaken on 17 October 2025. Minor
deficiencies were observed during weekly site inspection. Key
observations during the site inspections are summarized in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1 Summary
of Site Observation
|
Date |
Environmental
Observations |
Follow-up
Status |
|
3 October 2025 |
Nil. |
Nil. |
|
10 October 2025 |
Nil. |
Nil. |
|
17 October 2025 |
1.
Chemical
containers were observed without drip tray(s), drip tray(s) should be
provided to avoid leakage. |
1.
The concerned
chemical containers were placed inside drip tray. (Rectified on 23 October
2025) |
|
2.
Wastewater
treatment plant should be well maintained. |
2.
Wastewater
treatment plant was properly maintained. (Rectified on 23 October 2025) |
|
|
24 October 2025 |
Nil. |
Nil. |
|
31 October 2025 |
1.
Proper
cover should be provided to stockpile. |
1.
The stockpile
was removed. (Rectified on 6 November 2025) |
|
2.
Regular
watering should be provided to haul road |
2.
Additional
watering was applied to haul road. (Rectified on 6 November 2025) |
7.1.3
The Contractor has rectified all observation
identified during environmental site inspection.
7.1.4
According to the EIA Study Report,
Environmental Permit, contract documents and EM&A Manual, the mitigation
measures detailed in the documents had been implemented as much as practical
during the reporting period. An updated Implementation Status of Environmental
Mitigation Measures (EMIS) is provided in Appendix F.
8.1.1
The construction activities to be undertaken
in the next reporting period are listed below:
|
Construction
Activities To be Undertaken in Kai Tak West Area |
|
· Ramp construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck · Finishes (floor & wall) at Kai Tak
Phase 2B Landscaped Deck · EM&A works at Kai Tak Phase 2B
Landscaped Deck ·
Staircase
Construction at Kai Tak Phase 2B Landscaped Deck |
8.1.2
Potential environmental impacts arising from
the above construction activities are mainly associated with dust and waste
management.
8.1.3
The tentative schedule of air quality (1-hour
TSP and 24-hour TSP) monitoring and noise monitoring in the next reporting
period is presented in Appendix H.
8.1.4
The construction programme for the Project
for the next reporting period is presented in Appendix B.
9
Conclusion and
Recommendations
9.1.1
This is the 12th monthly EM&A Report presenting the
EM&A works undertaken in Kai Tak West Area during the period from 1 October 2025 to 31 October 2025 in accordance with the EM&A Manual and
the requirement under EP-457/2013/D.
9.1.2
Air quality monitoring (including 1-hour TSP
and 24-hour TSP) and noise monitoring were carried out in the reporting period.
No exceedance of the Action or Limit
Level was recorded for air quality monitoring and noise during the reporting period.
9.1.3
Weekly environmental site inspections by
representatives of the ET, the Contractor and the Engineer were conducted
during the reporting period. One joint site inspection with the IEC was carried
out on 17 October 2025. Minor deficiencies were observed during site
inspection and was rectified within specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
9.1.4
No complaint was received in the reporting period.
9.1.5
No non-compliance situation was received in
the reporting period.
9.1.6
No notification of summons or prosecution was
received since commencement of the Contract.
9.1.7
The ET will keep track on the construction
works to confirm compliance of environmental requirements and the proper
implementation of all necessary mitigation measures.
Appendix A
Alignment and Works Site in
Kai Tak West Area for Contract No. HY/2023/08
Kai Tak Phase
2B Landscaped Deck

Appendix B
Construction
Programme

Appendix C
Project
Organisation Chart
Appendix D
Event and Action Plan
(EAP) (Air Quality Monitoring)
|
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM (ET) |
INDEPENDENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKER (IEC) |
ENGINEER’S
REPRESENTATIVE (ER) |
CONTRACTOR |
|
|
ACTION LEVEL |
||||
|
Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify source,
investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform IEC and ER; 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase monitoring
frequency to daily. |
1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check Contractor’s working method. |
1. Notify Contractor. |
1. Rectify
any unacceptable practice; 2. Amend
working methods if appropriate. |
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Identify source; 2. Inform IEC and ER; 3. Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4. Repeat measurements to confirm findings; 5. Increase monitoring
frequency to daily; 6. Discuss with IEC and Contractor on remedial actions required; 7. If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER; 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise the ET on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to ER within 3 working days of notification; 2. Implement
the agreed proposals; 3. Amend
proposal if appropriate. |
|
LIMIT LEVEL |
||||
|
Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify source,
investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform ER, Contractor
and EPD; 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase monitoring
frequency to daily; 5. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep
IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results. |
1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification; 3. Implement
the agreed proposals; 4. Amend
proposal if appropriate. |
|
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Notify IEC, ER, Contractor and EPD; 2. Identify source; 3. Repeat measurement to confirm findings; 4. Increase monitoring
frequency to daily; 5. Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine
possible mitigation to be implemented; 6. Arrange meeting with IEC and ER to discuss the remedial actions to
be taken; 7. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep
IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results; 8. If exceedance stops,
cease additional monitoring. |
1. Discuss amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 2. Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure
their effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. In
consultation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures
to be implemented; 4. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented; 5. If
exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and
instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is
abated. |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification; 3. Implement
the agreed proposals; 4. Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control; 5. Stop
the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is
abated. |
Appendix E
Event and Action Plan
(EAP) (Noise Monitoring)
|
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM (ET) |
INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKER (IEC) |
ENGINEER’S
REPRESENTATIVE ER |
CONTRACTOR |
|
|
Action Level |
1. Identify source, investigate the causes
of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Notify IEC and Contractor; 3. Report
the results of investigation to the IEC, ER and Contractor; 4. Discuss
with the Contractor and formulate remedial measures; 5. Increase monitoring frequency to check mitigation effectiveness. |
1. Review
the analysed results submitted by the ET; 2. Review
the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Require Contractor to propose
remedial measures for the analysed noise problem; 4. Ensure remedial measures are
properly implemented |
1. Submit
noise mitigation proposals to IEC; 2. Implement noise mitigation
proposals. |
Appendix F
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule
|
EIA Ref. |
EM&A Log Ref. |
Recommended Mitigation
Measures |
Objectives of the
Recommended Measures & Main Concerns to address |
Implementation Agent |
Location / Timing |
Implementation Stage |
Requirements and/ or
standards to be achieved |
Implementation Status |
|
|
Construction Dust Impact |
|||||||||
|
S4.3.10 |
D1 |
The
contractor shall follow the procedures and requirements given in the Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation and Air Pollution Control (Non-road Mobile Machinery) (Emission) Regulation. |
Minimize dust
impact and adverse health effects at the nearby sensitive receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
·
APCO ·
To control
the dust impact to meet HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D2 |
·
Mitigation
measures in form of regular watering under a good site practice should be
adopted. Watering once per hour on
exposed worksites and haul road should be conducted to achieve dust removal
efficiencies of 91.7%. While the above watering frequencies are to be
followed, the extent of watering may vary depending on actual site conditions
but should be sufficient to maintain an equivalent intensity of no less than
1.3 L/m2 to achieve the dust removal efficiency. |
Minimize dust
impact at the nearby sensitive receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
·
APCO ·
To control
the dust impact to meet HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D3 |
·
Proper
watering at exposed spoil should be undertaken throughout the construction
phase; ·
Any excavated
or stockpile of dusty material should be covered entirely by impervious
sheeting or sprayed with water to maintain the entire surface wet and then
removed or backfilled or reinstated where practicable within 24 hours of the
excavation or unloading; ·
Any dusty
materials remaining after a stockpile is removed should be wetted with water
and cleared from the surface of roads; ·
A stockpile
of dusty material should not be extended beyond the pedestrian barriers,
fencing or traffic cones; ·
The load of
dusty materials on a vehicle leaving a construction site should be covered
entirely by impervious sheeting to ensure that the dusty materials do not
leak from the vehicle. ·
Where
practicable, vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet should
be provided at every discernible or designated vehicle exit point. The area where vehicle washing takes place
and the road section between the washing facilities and the exit point should
be paved with concrete, bituminous materials or hardcores; ·
When there
are open excavation and reinstatement works, hoarding of not less than 2.4m
high should be provided and properly maintained as far as practicable along
the site boundary with provision for public crossing. Good site practice shall also be adopted by
the Contractor to ensure the conditions of the hoardings are properly
maintained throughout the construction period; ·
The portion
of any road leading only to construction site that is within 30m of a vehicle
entrance or exit should be kept clear of dusty materials; ·
Surfaces
where any pneumatic or power-driven drilling, cutting, polishing or other
mechanical breaking operation takes place should be sprayed with water or a
dust suppression chemical continuously; ·
Any area that
involves demolition activities should be sprayed with water or a dust
suppression chemical immediately prior to, during and immediately after the
activities so as to maintain the entire surface wet; ·
Any skip
hoist for material transport should be totally enclosed by impervious sheeting; ·
Every stock
of more than 20 bags of cement or dry-pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should be
covered entirely by impervious sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the
top and the 3 sides; ·
Loading,
unloading, transfer, handling or storage of bulk cement or dry PFA should be
carried out in a totally enclosed system or facility, and any vent or exhaust
should be fitted with an effective fabric filter or equivalent air pollution
control system ·
Exposed earth
should be properly treated by compaction, turfing, hydroseeding, vegetation
planting or sealing with latex, vinyl, bitumen, shotcrete or other suitable
surface stabilizer within six months after the last construction activity on
the construction site or part of the construction site where the exposed
earth lies. |
Minimize dust
impact at the nearby sensitive receivers |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
·
APCO ·
To control
the dust impact to meet HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria |
Implemented, rectified after observation for 1st
and 2nd bullet. Implemented for the 3rd to 6th
bullet. N/A for
other bullets. |
|
|
S4.3.10 |
D6 |
Implement
regular dust monitoring under EM&A programme during the construction
stage. |
Monitoring of dust impact |
Contractor |
Selected rep. dust monitoring station |
Construction stage |
· TM-EIA |
Implemented |
|
|
Construction Noise
(Airborne) |
|||||||||
|
S5.4.1 |
N1 |
Implement the following good site practices: ·
Only
well-maintained plant should be operated on-site, and plant should be
serviced regularly during the construction programme; ·
Machines and
plant (such as trucks, cranes) that may be in intermittent use should be shut
down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum; ·
Plant known
to emit noise strongly in one direction, where possible, be orientated so
that the noise is directed away from nearby NSRs; ·
Silencers or
mufflers on construction equipment should be properly fitted and maintained
during the construction works; ·
Mobile plant
should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible and practicable; ·
Material
stockpiles, mobile container site office and other structures should be
effectively utilized, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site
construction activities. |
Control construction airborne noise |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
Implemented for the 1st, 2nd,
5th bullets, N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N2 |
Install
temporary hoarding located on the site boundaries between noisy construction
activities and NSRs. The conditions of
hoardings shall be properly maintained throughout the construction period. |
Reduce the construction noise levels at low-level
zone of NSRs through partial screening |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N3 |
Install
movable noise barriers (typical design is wooden framed barrier with a
small-cantilevered on a skid footing with 25mm thick internal sound
absorptive lining), acoustic mat or full enclosure, screen the noisy plants
including air compressors, generators and handheld breakers, etc. |
Screen the noisy plant items to be used at all
construction sites |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N4 |
Use ‘Quiet plant’ |
Reduce the noise levels of plant items |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N5 |
Loading/
unloading activities should be carried out inside the full enclosure of
mucking out points. |
Reduce the noise levels of loading/ unloading
activities |
Contractor |
Mucking out locations |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N6 |
Sequencing
operation of construction plants where practicable. |
Operate sequentially within the same work site to
reduce the construction airborne noise |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Annex 5, TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S5.4.1 |
N7 |
Implement a
noise monitoring programme under EM&A programme. |
Monitor the construction noise levels at the
selected representative locations |
Contractor |
Selected rep. noise monitoring station |
Construction stage |
· TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
Water Quality
(Construction Phase) |
|||||||||
|
S6.9.1.1 |
W1 |
In accordance
with the Practice Note for Professional Persons on Construction Site
Drainage, Environmental Protection Department, 2023 (ProPECC
PN 2/23), construction phase mitigation measures shall include the following: Construction
Runoff ·
At the start
of site establishment, perimeter cut-off drains to direct off-site water
around the site should be constructed with internal drainage works and
erosion and sedimentation control facilities implemented. Channels (both temporary and permanent
drainage pipes and culverts), earth bunds or sandbag barriers should be
provided on site to direct stormwater to silt removal facilities. The design of the temporary on-site drainage
system will be undertaken by the contractor prior to the commencement of construction; ·
The dikes or
embankments for flood protection should be implemented around the boundaries
of earthwork areas. Temporary ditches
should be provided to facilitate the runoff discharge into an appropriate
watercourse, through a silt/ sediment trap.
The sediment/ silt traps should be incorporated in the permanent
drainage channels to enhance deposition rates; ·
The design of
efficient silt removal facilities should be based on the guidelines in
Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 2/23, which states that
the retention time for silt/ sand traps should be 5 minutes under maximum
flow conditions. Sizes may vary
depending upon the flow rate, but for a flow rate of 0.1 m3/s a
sedimentation basin of 30 m3 would be required and for a flow rate
of 0.5 m3/s the basin would be 150 m3. The detailed design of the sand/ silt traps
shall be undertaken by the contractor prior to the commencement of construction; ·
All exposed
earth areas should be completed and vegetated as soon as possible after
earthworks have been completed, or alternatively, within 14 days of the
cessation of earthworks where practicable.
Exposed slope surfaces should be covered by tarpaulin or other means; ·
The overall
slope of the site should be kept to a minimum to reduce the erosive potential
of surface water flows, and all traffic areas and access roads protected by
coarse stone ballast. An additional
advantage accruing from the use of crushed stone is the positive traction
gained during prolonged periods of inclement weather and the reduction of
surface sheet flows; ·
All drainage
facilities and erosion and sediment control structures should be regularly
inspected and maintained to ensure proper and efficient
operation at all times and particularly following rainstorms. Deposited silt and grit should be removed
regularly and disposed of by spreading evenly over stable, vegetated areas; ·
Measures
should be taken to minimize the ingress of site drainage into
excavations. If the excavation of
trenches in wet periods is necessary, they should be dug and backfilled in
short sections wherever practicable.
Water pumped out from trenches or foundation excavations should be
discharged into storm drains via silt removal facilities; ·
Open
stockpiles of construction materials (for example, aggregates, sand and fill
material) of more than 50m3 should be covered with tarpaulin or
similar fabric during rainstorms.
Measures should be taken to prevent the washing away of construction
materials, soil, silt or debris into any drainage system; ·
Manholes
should always be adequately covered and temporarily sealed so
as to prevent silt, construction materials or debris being washed into
the drainage system and storm runoff being directed into foul sewers; ·
Precautions
be taken at any time of year when rainstorms are likely, actions to be taken
when a rainstorm is imminent or forecasted, and actions to be taken during or
after rainstorms are summarized in Appendix A2 of ProPECC
PN 2/23. Particular attention should
be paid to the control of silty surface runoff during storm events,
especially for areas located near steep slopes; ·
All vehicles
and plant should be cleaned before leaving a construction site to ensure no
earth, mud, debris and the like is deposited by them on roads. An adequately designed and site wheel
washing facilities should be provided at every construction site exit where
practicable. Wash-water should have
sand and silt settled out and removed at least on a weekly basis to ensure
the continued efficiency of the process.
The section of access road leading to, and exiting from, the wheel
wash bay to the public road should be paved with sufficient backfall toward
the wheel wash bay to prevent vehicle tracking of soil and silty water to
public roads and drains; ·
Oil
interceptors should be provided in the drainage system downstream of any oil/
fuel pollution sources. The oil
interceptors should be emptied and cleaned regularly to prevent the release
of oil and grease into the storm water drainage system after accidental
spillage. A bypass should be provided
for the oil interceptors to prevent flushing during heavy rain; ·
Construction
solid waste, debris and rubbish on site should be collected, handled and
disposed of properly to avoid water quality impacts; ·
All fuel
tanks and storage areas should be provided with locks and sited on sealed
areas, within bunds of a capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of
the largest tank to prevent spilled fuel oils from reaching water sensitive
receivers nearby; ·
Adopt best
management practices; ·
All earth
works should be conducted sequentially to limit the amount of construction
runoff generated from exposed areas during the wet season (April to
September) as far as practicable. |
To minimize water quality impact from the
construction site runoff and general construction activities |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-EIAO · TM-DSS |
Implemented, rectified after observation for 6th
bullet. Implemented for the 1st, 3rd,
7th to 11th, 13th, 14th to 16th
bullets N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S6.9.1.2 |
W2 |
Tunnelling
Works and Underground Works ·
Cut-&-cover
tunnelling work should be conducted sequentially to limit the amount of construction runoff generated from exposed areas during the wet season (April to September) as far as practicable. ·
Uncontaminated
discharge should pass through sedimentation tanks prior to off-site discharge; ·
The
wastewater with a high concentration of SS should be treated (e.g. by
sedimentation tanks with sufficient retention time) before discharge. Oil interceptors would also be required to
remove oil, lubricants and grease from the wastewater; ·
Direct
discharge of the bentonite slurry (as a result of
D-wall) is not allowed. It should be
reconditioned and reused wherever practicable. Temporary storage locations (typically a
properly closed warehouse) should be provided on site for any unused
bentonite that needs to be transported away after all the related
construction activities area completed.
The requirements in ProPECC PN 2/23 should
be adhered to in the handling and disposal of bentonite slurries. |
To minimize construction water quality impact
from tunnelling works |
Contractor |
All tunnelling portion |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-DSS · TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S6.9.1.3 |
W3 |
Sewage
Effluent ·
Portable
chemical toilets and sewage holding tanks are recommended for handling the
construction sewage generated by the workforce. A licensed contractor should be employed to
provide appropriate and adequate portable toilets and be responsible for
appropriate disposal and maintenance. |
To minimize water quality from sewage effluent |
Contractor |
All construction sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · TM-DSS |
Implemented |
|
|
S6.9.1.5 |
W4 |
Groundwater
from Potential Contaminated Area: ·
No direct
discharge of groundwater from contaminated areas should be adopted. ·
A discharge
license under the WPCO through the Regional Office of EPD for groundwater discharge should be applied. Prior to the excavation works within these potentially contaminated areas, the groundwater quality should be reviewed during the process of discharge license application. The compliance to the Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage on Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters (TM-DSS)
and the existence of prohibited substance should be confirmed. If the review results indicated that the groundwater to be generated from the excavation works would be contaminated, the contaminated groundwater should be either properly treated in compliance with the requirements of the TM-DSS or properly recharged into the ground. ·
If wastewater
treatment is deployed, the wastewater treatment unit shall deploy suitable treatment process (e.g. oil interceptor / activated carbon) to reduce the pollution level to an acceptable standard and remove any prohibited substances (e.g. TPH) to undetectable range. All treated effluent from wastewater treatment plant shall meet the requirements as stated in TM-DSS and should be discharged into the foul sewers. ·
If
groundwater recharging wells are deployed, recharging wells should be installed as appropriate for recharging the contaminated groundwater back into the ground. The recharging wells should be selected at places where the groundwater quality will not be affected by the recharge operation as indicated in the Section 2.3 of TM-DSS. The baseline groundwater quality shall be determined prior to the selection of the recharge wells, and submit a
working plan (including the laboratory analytical results showing the quality of groundwater at the
proposed recharge location(s) as well as the pollutant levels of groundwater
to be recharged) to EPD for agreement. Pollution levels of groundwater to be
recharged shall not be higher than pollutant levels of ambient groundwater at
the recharge well. Prior to recharge, any prohibited substances such as TPH
products should be removed as necessary by installing the petrol interceptor. |
To minimize groundwater quality impact from
contaminated area |
Contractor |
Excavation areas where contamination is found |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · TM-DSS · TM-EIAO |
N/A |
|
|
S6.9.1.6 |
W6 |
Accidental
Spillage In order to prevent
accidental spillage of chemicals, the following is recommended: ·
All the
tanks, containers, storage area should be bunded and the locations should be
locked as far as possible from the sensitive watercourse and stormwater drains; ·
The
Contractor should register as a chemical waste producer if chemical wastes
would be generated. Storage of
chemical waste arising from the construction activities should be stored with
suitable labels and warnings. Disposal of
chemical wastes should be conducted in compliance with the requirements as
stated in the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation. |
To minimize water quality impact from accidental
spillage |
Contractor |
All construction site where practicable |
Construction stage |
· Water Pollution Control Ordinance · ProPECC PN 2/23 · TM-EIAO · TM-DSS |
Implemented, rectified after observation for 1st
bullet. Implemented for others bullet. |
|
|
Waste
Management (Construction Waste) |
|||||||||
|
S7.4.1 |
WM1 |
On-site
sorting of C&D material ·
Geological
assessment should be carried out by competent persons on site during
excavation to identify materials which are not suitable to use as aggregate
in structural concrete (e.g. volcanic rock, Aplite dyke rock, etc.). Volcanic rock and Aplite dyke rock should
be separated at the source sites as far as practicable and stored at
designated stockpile area preventing them from delivering to crushing
facilities. The crushing plant
operator should also be reminded to set up measures to prevent unsuitable
rock from ending up at concrete batching plants and be turned into concrete
for structural use. Details regarding
control measures at source site and crushing facilities should be submitted
by the Contractor for the Engineer to review and agree. In addition, site records should also be
kept for the types of rock materials excavated and the traceability of
delivery will be ensured with the implementation of Trip Ticket System and
enforced by site supervisory staff as stipulated under DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010
for tracking of the correct delivery to the rock crushing facilities for
processing into aggregates.
Alternative disposal option for the reuse of volcanic rock and Aplite
Dyke rock, etc. should be explored. |
Separation of unsuitable rock from ending up at
concrete batching plants and be turned into concrete for structural use |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· DEVB (W) No. 6/2010 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM2 |
Construction
and Demolition Material ·
Maintain
temporary stockpiles and reuse excavated fill material for backfilling and reinstatement; ·
Carry out
on-site sorting; ·
Make
provisions in the Contract documents to allow and promote the use of recycled
aggregates where appropriate; ·
Adopt
‘selective demolition’ technique to demolish the existing structures and
facilities with a view to recovering broken concrete effectively for
recycling purpose, where possible; ·
Implement a
trip-ticket system for each works contract to ensure that the disposal of
C&D materials is properly documented and verified; and ·
Implement an
enhanced Waste Management Plan similar to ETWBTC
(Works) No. 19/2005 – “Environmental Management on Construction Sites” to
encourage on-site sorting of C&D materials and to minimize their
generation during the course of construction. |
Good site practice to minimize the waste
generation and recycle the C&D materials as far as practicable so as to reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance · Waste Disposal Ordinance · ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 |
Implemented for the 1st, 2nd,
3rd, 5th, 6th bullets N/A for other bullets |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM3 |
C&D Waste ·
Standard
formwork or pre-fabrication should be used as far as practicable in order to minimize the arising of C&D
materials. The use of more durable
formwork or plastic facing for the construction works should be
considered. Use of wooden hoardings
should not be used, as in other projects.
Metal hoarding should be used to enhance the possibility of
recycling. The purchasing of
construction materials will be carefully planned in order
to avoid over ordering and wastage; ·
The
Contractor should recycle as much of the C&D materials as possible
on-site. Public fill and C&D waste should be segregated and stored in
different containers or skips to enhance reuse or recycling of materials and
their proper disposal. Where
practicable, concrete and masonry can be crushed and used as fill. Steel reinforcement bar can be used by
scrap steel mills. Different areas of
the sites should be considered for such segregation and storage. |
Good site practice to minimize the waste
generation and recycle the C&D materials as far as practicable so as to reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance · Waste Disposal Ordinance · ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM4 |
Excavated
Contaminated Soils ·
Details of
the mitigation measures on handling of the contaminated soil shall be
referred to Section on Land Contamination below. |
The contaminated soil will be excavated for on-site reuse |
Contractor |
PBH4 |
Prior to commencement of construction works within the contaminated area |
· Practice Guide (PG) for Investigation and
Remediation of Contaminated Land · GN/GM for land contamination |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM5 |
Land-based
Sediment ·
All
construction plant and equipment shall be designed and maintained to minimize the risk of silt, sediments, contaminants or other pollutants being released into the water column or deposited in the locations other than designated location; ·
All vessels
shall be sized such that adequate draft is maintained between vessels and the sea bed at all states
of the tide to ensure that undue turbidity is not generated by
turbulence from vessel movement or propeller wash; ·
Before moving
the vessels which are used for transporting dredged material, excess material shall be cleaned from the decks and exposed fittings of vessels and the
excess materials shall never be dumped into the sea except at the
approved locations; ·
Adequate
freeboard shall be maintained on barges to ensure that decks are not washed by wave action. ·
The
Contractors shall monitor all vessels transporting material to ensure that no dumping outside the approved location takes place. The Contractor shall keep and produce logs and other records to demonstrate compliance and that journeys are consistent with designated locations and copies of such records shall be submitted to the engineers; ·
The
Contractors shall comply with the conditions in the dumping license. ·
All bottom
dumping vessels (Hopper barges) shall be fitted with tight fittings seals to their bottom openings to prevent leakage of material; ·
The material
shall be placed into the disposal pit by bottom dumping; ·
Contaminated
marine mud shall be transported by spit barge of not less than 750m3 capacity and capable of rapid opening
and discharge at the disposal site; ·
Discharge
shall be undertaken rapidly, and the hoppers shall be closed immediately. Material adhering to the sides of the hopper shall not be washed out of the hopper and the hopper shall remain closed until the barge returns to the disposal site. ·
For Type 3
special disposal treatment, sealing of contaminant with geosynthetic containment before dropping designated mud pit would be a possible arrangement. A geosynthetic containment method is a method whereby the sediments are sealed in geosynthetic containers and, the containers would be dropped into the designated contaminated mud pit where they would be covered by further mud disposal and later by the mud pit capping at the disposal site, thereby fulfilling the requirements for fully confined mud disposal. |
To control pollution due to marine sediment |
Contractor |
Along CKR alignment |
Construction stage |
· ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 |
N/A |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM6 |
Chemical
Waste ·
Chemical
waste that is produced, as defined by Schedule 1 of the Waste Disposal
(Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation, should be handled in accordance with
the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes; ·
Containers
used for the storage of chemical wastes should be suitable for the substance
they are holding, resistant to corrosion, maintained in a good condition, and
securely closed, have a capacity of less than 450 L unless the specification
has been approved by EPD, and display a label in English and Chinese in
accordance with instructions prescribed in Schedule 2 of the regulation; ·
The storage
area for chemical wastes should be clearly labelled and used solely for the
storage of chemical waste, enclosed on at least 3 sides, have an impermeable
floor and bunding of sufficient capacity to accommodate 110% of the volume of
the largest container or 20% of the total volume of waste stored in that
area, whichever is the greatest, have adequate ventilation, covered to
prevent rainfall entering, and arranged so that incompatible materials are
adequately separated; ·
Disposal of
chemical waste should be via a licensed waste collector, be to a facility
licensed to receive chemical waste, such as the Chemical Waste Treatment
Centre which also offers a chemical waste collection service and can supply
the necessary storage containers, or be to a reuser
of the waste, under approval from EPD.
|
Control the chemical waste and ensure proper
storage, handling and disposal |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General)
Regulation · Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and
Storage of Chemical Waste |
Implemented for the 2nd and 3rd
bullet. N/A for other bullet. |
|
|
S7.5.1 |
WM7 |
General
Refuse ·
General
refuse generated on-site should be stored in enclosed bins or compaction
units separately from construction and chemical wastes; ·
A reputable
waste collector should be employed by the Contractor to remove general refuse
from the site, separately from construction and chemical wastes, on a daily basis to minimize odour, pest and litter
impacts. Burning of refuse on
construction sites is prohibited by law. ·
Aluminium
cans are often recovered from the waste stream by individual collectors if
they are segregated and made easily accessible. Separate labelled bins for their deposit
should be provided if feasible; ·
Office wastes
can be reduced through the recycling of paper if volumes are large enough to
warrant collection. Participation in a
local collection scheme should be considered by the Contractor. |
Minimize production of the general refuse and
avoid odour, pest and litter impacts |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
· Waste Disposal Ordinance |
Implemented. |
|
|
Hazard to
Life |
|||||||||
|
H8 |
The driver and his assistant should be physically
healthy, experienced and have good safe driving records. The driver should hold a proper driving
licence for the approved transport truck.
Dedicated training programme and regular road safety briefing
sessions/ workshops should be provided to enhance their safe driving attitude
and practice. Smoking should be strictly
prohibited. |
To reduce the
risk during explosives transport |
Contractor |
Works areas
at which explosives would be used |
Construction
stage |
- |
N/A |
||
|
S9.18 |
H9 |
Emergency
response plans in case of road accident should be prepared and
implemented. The driver and his
assistant should be familiar with the emergency procedures including
evacuation, and proper communication/ fire-fighting equipment should be
provided to the driver and his assistant. |
To reduce the risk during explosives transport |
Contractor |
Works areas at which explosives would be used |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
Landscape & Visual |
|||||||||
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV3 |
Good Site Management ·
Large
temporary stockpiles of excavated material shall be covered with unobtrusive
sheeting to prevent dust and dirt spreading to adjacent landscape areas and
vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy visual appearance. ·
Construction
plant and building material shall be orderly and carefully stored in order to create a neat and tidy visual appearance. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
Within Project site |
Construction stage |
- |
Implemented for the 2nd bullet N/A for another bullet |
|
|
LV4 |
Screen
Hoarding · Decorative screen hoarding should be erected to
screen the public from the construction area.
It should be designed to be compatible with the existing urban
context. |
Minimize
visual impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
- |
N/A |
||
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV5 |
Lighting Control during Construction ·
All lighting
in the construction site shall be carefully controlled to minimize light
pollution and night-time glare to nearby residencies and GIC. The Contractor shall consider other
security measures, which shall minimize the visual impacts. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
Within Project site |
Construction stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV6 |
Erosion Control ·
The potential
for soil erosion shall be reduced by minimizing the extent of vegetation
disturbance on site and by providing a protective cover over newly exposed
soil. |
Minimize
landscape impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
- |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV7 |
Tree Protection & Preservation ·
Carefully
protected during construction. Tree
protection measures will be detailed at the Tree Removal Application stage
and plans submitted to the relevant Government Department for approval in due
course in accordance with ETWB TC No. 3/2006. |
Minimize
landscape and visual impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
·
‘Guidelines
for Tree Risk Management and Assessment Arrangement on an Area Basis and on a
Tree Basis’, Greening, Landscape and Tree Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB ·
Latest
recommended horticultural practices from GLTM Section, DEVB |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV8 |
Tree Transplantation ·
For trees
unavoidably affected by the Project that have to be
removed, where practical transplantation will be chosen as the top priority
method of removal. If this is not
possible or practical compensatory planting will be provided for trees
unavoidably felled (See LV10). For
trees unavoidably affected by the Project works that are transplanted,
transplantation must be carried out in accordance with ETWB TCW 2/2004 and
3/2006. |
Minimize
landscape and visual impact |
Contractor |
Within
Project site and designated off-site locations |
Prior to
Construction stage |
·
ETWB TCW
3/2006 ·
Latest
recommended horticultural practices from Greening, Landscape and Tree
Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB ·
ETWB TCW
2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1
Table 10.11 |
LV9 |
Compensatory Planting ·
For trees
unavoidably affected by the Project that have to be
removed, where practical transportation will be chosen as the top priority
method of removal but if this is not possible or practical compensatory
planting will be provided for trees unavoidably felled. All felled trees shall be compensated for
by planting trees to the satisfaction of relevant Government projects. Required numbers and locations of
compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately with Government
during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWB TC 3/2006. ·
Compensatory
tree planting may be incorporated into public open spaces and along roadside
amenity areas affected by the construction works and therefore be part of the
bigger wider planting plans. Onsite
compensation planting is preferred but, if necessary, additional receptor
sites outside the Works Area shall be agreed separately with the Government
during the Tree Felling Application process. |
Minimize
visual impact and also enhance landscape |
Contractor |
Within
Project site |
Construction
stage |
·
ETWB TCW
3/2006 ·
Latest
recommended horticultural practices from Greening, Landscape and Tree
Management (GLTM) Section, DEVB ·
ETWB TCW
2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV10 |
Screen Planting ·
Tall
screen/buffer trees, shrubs and climbers should be planted, in so far as is
possible, to soften and screen proposed structures such as roads and central
strip, vertical edges and buildings and to enhance streetscape greening
effect where appropriate. Indiscriminate use of trees for screening must be
avoided and the principle of ‘right tree for the right place’ must be
followed. This detail will be provided at the Detailed Design stage. This
measure may additionally form part of the compensatory planting and will
improve and create a pleasant pedestrian environment. |
Minimize
visual impact and also enhance
landscape. |
Contractor |
Within Project Site |
Construction Phase |
·
Guidelines on
Greening of Noise Barriers, issued April 2012, GLTMS, DevB
·
ETWB TCW
2/2004 |
N/A |
|
|
S10.10.1 Table 10.11 |
LV12 |
Reinstatement ·
All works
areas, excavated areas and disturbed areas for tunnel construction and
temporary road diversion or any other proposed works shall be reinstated to
former conditions or better, with reasonable landscape treatment and to the
satisfaction of the relevant Government departments. (Specific mitigation for
disturbance to public open space is detailed separately under LV14.) |
Minimize landscape impact |
Contractor |
Within Project Site |
Construction Phase |
·
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Cultural Heritage Impact (Construction Phase) |
|||||||||
|
S11.4.4 |
CH1 |
The
contractor should be alerted during the construction on the possibility of
locating archaeological remains and as a precautionary measure, AMO shall be
informed immediately in case of discovery of antiquities or supposed
antiquities in the subject sites. |
To preserve any cultural heritage items which may
be removed and damaged by the excavation |
Contractor |
During construction works for cut and cover
tunnels |
Construction stage |
·
AMOs
requirements |
N/A |
|
|
EM&A Project |
|||||||||
|
S13.2 |
EM1 |
An
Independent Environmental Checker needs to be employed as per the EM&A
Manual |
Control EM&A Performance |
Highways Department |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
·
EIAO Guidance
Note No. 4/2010 ·
TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
|
S13.2-13.4 |
EM2 |
·
An
Environmental Team needs to be employed as per the EM&A Manual; ·
Prepare a
systematic Environmental Management Plan to ensure effective implementation
of the mitigation measures; ·
An
environmental impact monitoring needs to be implemented by the Environmental
Team to ensure all the requirements given in the EM&A Manual are fully
complied with. |
Perform environmental monitoring & auditing |
Highways Department/ Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction stage |
·
EIAO Guidance
Note No. 4/2010 ·
TM-EIAO |
Implemented |
|
Appendix G
Location Plan of
Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Station

Appendix H
Monitoring
Schedule for the Reporting Month and Coming Month
Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month
(October 2025)

Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month (November
2025)

Appendix I
Calibration
Certificates for Air Quality Monitoring Equipment




Appendix J
Air Quality
Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentations



Data of Wind
Direction Extracted from Kai Tak Wind Station of the Hong Kong Observatory












Data of Wind Speed
Extracted from Kai Tak Wind Station of the Hong Kong Observatory












Appendix K
Calibration
Certificates for Noise Monitoring Equipment










Appendix L
Noise Monitoring
Results and their Graphical Presentations



Appendix M
Waste Flow Table

Appendix N
Statistics on
Complaint, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
|
1 October 2025 - 31 October 2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Non-compliance
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Non-compliance Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 October 2025 - 31 October 2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Summons Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 October 2025 - 31 October 2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
|
Reporting Period |
Environmental Prosecution Statistics |
||
|
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Details |
|
|
1 October 2025 - 31 October 2025 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
