Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1

1.......... INTRODUCTION. 3

1.1 Purpose of the Report 3

1.2 Report Structure. 3

2.......... Project Information. 4

2.1 Background. 4

2.2 Site Description. 4

2.3 Construction Programme and Activities. 5

2.4 Project Organization. 6

2.5 Status of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits. 7

3.......... Environmental Monitoring Requirements. 8

3.1 Construction Dust Monitoring. 8

3.2 Construction Noise Monitoring. 11

3.3 Landscape and Visual 13

4.......... Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures. 13

5.......... Monitoring Results. 14

5.1 Construction Dust Monitoring. 14

5.2 Regular Construction Noise Monitoring. 14

5.3 Waste Management 15

5.4 Landscape and Visual 15

6.......... ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION AND AUDIT. 16

6.2 Summary of Monitoring Exceedances. 17

6.3 Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance. 17

6.4 Summary of Environmental Complaints. 17

6.5 Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecutions. 17

7.......... FUTURE KEY ISSUES. 18

7.1 Construction Programme for the Next Three Month. 18

7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month. 18

7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month. 18

8.......... ConclusionS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 19

8.1 Conclusions. 19

8.2 Recommendations. 19

List of Tables

Table 2.1.......... Construction Activities in the reporting month. 5

Table 2.2.......... Contact Information of Key Personnel 6

Table 2.3.......... Status of Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits. 7

Table 3.1.......... Air Quality Monitoring Equipment 8

Table 3.2.......... Location of Construction Dust Monitoring Station. 8

Table 3.3.......... Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration. 11

Table 3.4.......... Noise Monitoring Equipment for Regular Noise Monitoring. 11

Table 3.5.......... Noise Monitoring Stations during Construction Phase. 11

Table 3.6.......... Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration. 12

Table 4.1.......... Status of Required Submission under Environmental Permit 13

Table 5.1.......... Summary of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period. 14

Table 5.2.......... Summary of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period. 14

Table 5.3.......... Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period. 14

Table 6.1.......... Observations and Recommendations of Site Audit 16

Table 7.1.......... Construction Activities in the coming three month. 18

List of Figures

Figure 1.1	Site Layout Plan
Figure 3.1	Location of Air Quality Monitoring Station
Figure 3.2	Locations of Noise Monitoring Station

List of Appendices

Appendix A	Construction Programme
Appendix B	Project Organization Structure
Appendix C	Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures
Appendix D	Summary of Action and Limit Levels
Appendix E	Calibration Certificates of Equipment
Appendix F	EM&A Monitoring Schedules
Appendix G	Air Quality Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentations
Appendix H	Noise Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentations
Appendix I	Event and Action Plan
Appendix J	Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Appendix K	Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Central Kowloon Route – Kai Tak West (CKR-KTW; Contract No. HY/2014/07) (hereafter called “the Project”) covers part of the construction of the Central Kowloon Route (CKR).

The Project comprises the follow works:

· 50x30m access shaft with noise enclosure at Ma Tau Kok (MTK);

· 100m long cut-and-cover (C&C) tunnel at MTK;

· Demolition and re-provisioning of MTK Public Pier;

· 160m long underwater tunnel (UWT) (Stage 1);

· 210m long UWT (Stage 2);

· 60m long C&C tunnel at Kai Tak;

· 130m long depressed road and 200m long underpass at Kai Tak;

· 390m long underground tunnel ventilation adit at Kai Tak;

· Seawall demolition and construction of new landing steps; and

· Barging Point enclosure and conveyor system.

The EM&A programme commenced on 4 April 2018.The impact EM&A for the Project includes air quality and noise monitoring.

This is the twenty-fourth monthly EM&A Report presenting the EM&A works carried out during the period between 1 and 31 March 2020. As informed by the Contractor, major activities in the reporting period were:

Locations	Site Activities
Kai Tak	· Excavation and ELS installation at cut & cover tunnel, depressed road and underpass; · Construction of New Right of Way; · Temporary Grouting
Ma Tau Kok	· TTM implementation; · Pipe piling works for cut and cover tunnel; · Rock Excavation; · ELS installation & Access platform concreting works; · Existing drainage diversion works; · Laying of lighting ducts; · Excavation at Covered Walkway
Kowloon Bay	· Excavation for Stage 1 underwater tunnel; · S1 Truss fabrication and installation; · Temporary Grouting; · Pumping Test
Barging Point	· Barging point operation (Spoil Disposal)

Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality

All 24-hour TSP result was below the Action and Limit Levels at all monitoring locations in the reporting month.

All 1-hour TSP result was below the Action and Limit Levels at all monitoring locations in the reporting month.

Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Noise

Regular Noise Monitoring

No Action Level exceedance was recorded since no noise related complaint was received in the reporting month.

No exceedance of Limit Level of noise was recorded in the reporting month.

Complaint, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution

No notification of complaint, summons and successful prosecution were received in the reporting month.

Reporting Changes

There was no reporting change in the reporting month.

Future Key Issues

Key issues to be considered in the next three months included:

Locations	Site Activities
Kai Tak	· Base slab and wall, roof slab construction at underpass and depressed road; · Excavation and ELS installation at cut & cover tunnel, depressed road and underpass; · Temporary Grouting; · Backfilling works and ELS removal at Underpass
Ma Tau Kok	· TTM implementation; · Rock excavation; · ELS installation and Access platform concreting works; · Pipe piling works for cut and cover tunnel; · Laying of lighting ducts at Metered Carpark area; · Fresh water pipe installation works; · Covered walkway construction
Kowloon Bay	· Excavation for stage 1 underwater tunnel; · S3 - S7 ELS installation; · Temporary Grouting; · Pumping Test; · Blinding layer and base slab constrcution
Barging Point	· Barging point operation (Spoil Disposal)

Potential environmental impacts arising from the above construction activities are mainly associated with construction dust, construction noise, water pollution control, and waste management.

1 INTRODUCTION

Gammon Construction Limited was commissioned by the Highways Department as the Civil Contractor for Works Contract HY/2014/07. AECOM Asia Company Limited (AECOM) was appointed by Gammon Construction Limited as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme during construction phase of the Project.

1.1 Purpose of the Report

1.1.1 This is the twenty-fourth monthly EM&A Report which summarizes the impact monitoring results and audit findings for the Project during the reporting period between 1 and 31 March 2020.

1.2 Report Structure

1.2.1 This monthly EM&A Report is organized as follows:

· Section 1: Introduction

· Section 2: Project Information

· Section 3: Environmental Monitoring Requirement

· Section 4: Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures

· Section 5: Monitoring Results

· Section 6: Environmental Site Inspection and Audit

· Section 7: Environmental Non-conformance

· Section 8: Future Key Issues

· Section 9: Conclusions and Recommendations

2 Project Information

2.1 Background

2.1.1 CKR is a dual 3-lane trunk road across central Kowloon linking the West Kowloon in the west and the Kai Tak Development (KTD) in the east. The CKR will be about 4.7 km long with an underground tunnel section of about 3.9 km long, in particular, there will be an underwater tunnel of about 370 m long in Kowloon Bay to the north of the To Kwa Wan Typhoon Shelter. It will connect the West Kowloon Highway at Yau Ma Tei Interchange with the road network at Kowloon Bay and the future Trunk Road T2 at KTD which will connect to the future Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LTT) and Cross Bay Link (CBL). CKR, Trunk Road T2 and TKO-LTT will form a strategic highway link, namely Route 6, connecting West Kowloon and Tseung Kwan O. In addition, 3 ventilation buildings, which will be located in Ya Ma Tei, Ho Man Tin and ex-Kai Tak airport area, are proposed to ensure acceptable air quality within the tunnel.

2.1.2 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for Central Kowloon Route (Register No.: AEIAR-171/2013) was approved on 11 July 2013 under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO). Following the approval of the EIA Report, an Environmental Permit (EP) for CKR was granted on 9 August 2013 (EP No.: EP- 457/2013) for the construction and operation. Variation of EP (VEP) was subsequently applied and the latest EP (EP No. EP-457/2013/C) was issued by the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) on 16 January 2017. Further Environmental Permit (EP No. FEP-01/457/2013/C) for CKR – Kai Tak West was issued on 28 February 2018.

2.1.3 The construction of the CKR had been divided into different sections. This Work Contract HY/2014/07 – Kai Tak West (KTW) (“The Project”) will include a road which is a trunk road, including new roads, and major extensions or improvements to existing roads; a road fully enclosed by decking above and by structure on the sides for more than 100 m; and reclamation works (including associated dredging works) more than 1 ha in size and a boundary of which is less than 100 m from an existing residential area.

2.1.4 The site layout plan of the Project is shown in Figure 1.1.

2.2 Site Description

2.2.1 The major construction activities under this Project include:

(a) construction of approximately 160m long cut-and-cover tunnel and 370m long underwater tunnel between the tunnel section at Ma Tau Kok and the depressed road of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;

(b) reconstruction of the seawall at Ma Tau Kok public pier, and the sloping seawall at the Former Kai Tak Airport Runway;

(c) construction of approximately 125m long depressed road and 200m long underpass of the CKR within Kai Tak Development;

(d) construction of approximately 360m long underground tunnel ventilation adit of the CKR;

(e) reconstruction of Kowloon City Ferry Pier Public Transport Interchange; and

(f) other associated works.

2.3 Construction Programme and Activities

2.3.1 The major construction activities undertaken in the reporting month are summarized in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Construction Activities in the reporting month

Locations	Site Activities
Kai Tak	· Excavation and ELS installation at cut & cover tunnel, depressed road and underpass; · Construction of New Right of Way; · Temporary Grouting
Ma Tau Kok	· TTM implementation; · Pipe piling works for cut and cover tunnel; · Rock Excavation; · ELS installation & Access platform concreting works; · Existing drainage diversion works; · Laying of lighting ducts; · Excavation at Covered Walkway
Kowloon Bay	· Excavation for Stage 1 underwater tunnel; · S1 Truss fabrication and installation; · Temporary Grouting; · Pumping Test
Barging Point	· Barging point operation (Spoil Disposal)

2.3.2 The construction programme is presented in Appendix A.

2.4 Project Organization

2.4.1 The project organization structure is shown in Appendix B. The key personnel contact names and numbers for the Project are summarized in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2 Contact Information of Key Personnel

Party	Role	Position	Name	Telephone	Fax
Arup-Mott MacDonald Joint Venture	Residential Engineer (ER)	Engineer’s Representative	Mr. Jeffrey Lau	2268 3640	2268 3954
ERM	Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)	Independent Environmental Checker	Ms. Mandy To	2271 3313	2723 5660
Gammon	Contractor	Contracts Manager	Mr. Alan Yan	2516 8823	2516 6260
		Environmental Manager	Ms Michelle Tang	9267 8866
AECOM	Contractor’s Environmental Team (ET)	ET Leader	Mr. Y T Tang	3922 9392	2317 7609

2.5 Status of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits

2.5.1 Relevant environmental licenses, permits and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project and valid in the reporting month are summarized in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3 Status of Environmental Licenses, Notifications and Permits

Permit / License No. / Notification/ Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
	From	To
Further Environmental Permit
FEP-01/457/2013/C	28 Feb 2018	End of Project	Valid	--
Wastewater Discharge License
WT00030290-2018	22 Mar 2018	31 Mar 2023	Valid	Ma Tau Kok
WT00030668-2018	27 Apr 2018	30 Apr 2023	Valid	Site Office at Kai Tak West
WT00030358-2018	27 Apr 2018	30 Apr 2023	Valid	Kai Tak West
WT00030333-2018	27 Apr 2018	30 Apr 2023	Valid	Barging Point at Portions 4B & 4C
WT00030330-2018	27 Apr 2018	30 Apr 2023	Valid	Kowloon Bay
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0108-20	6 Mar 2020	26 Aug 2020	Valid on 6 Mar 2020	Barging Point Operation at Kai Tak Barging Point
GW-RE1013-19	17 Dec 2019	16 Apr 2020	Valid	Rock Breaking at Ma Tau Kok
GW-RE0986-19	6 Dec 2019	1 Jun 2020	Valid	General Works at Kai Tak
GW-RE1012-19	17 Dec 2019	12 Jun 2020	Valid	Welding and backfilling at Stage 1 Underwater Tunnel
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
5118-247-G2347-47	30 Jan 2018	End of Project	Valid	--
5118-247-G2347-48	30 Jan 2018	End of Project	Valid	--
Marine Dumping Permit
EP/MD/20-048	16 Oct 2019	15 Apr 2020	Valid	Sediments requiring Type 1 - Open Sea Disposal
EP/MD/20-122	6 Feb 2020	5 Mar 2020	Valid until 5 Mar 2020	Sediments requiring Type 1 (Dedicated Site) and Type 2 Confined Marine Disposal
EP/MD/20-134	6 Mar 2020	5 Apr 2020	Valid on 6 Mar 2020
Billing Account for Construction Waste Disposal
7029909	22 Jan 2018	End of Project	Account Active	--
7031949	26 Feb 2020	26 May 2020	Account Active	Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste (by vessels)
Notification Under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
429442	5 Jan 2018	5 Jul 2025	Notified	--

3 Environmental Monitoring Requirements

3.1 Construction Dust Monitoring

Monitoring Requirements

3.1.1 In accordance with the approved EM&A Manual, measurement of 24-hour and 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) level at the designated air quality monitoring station is required. Impact 24-hour TSP monitoring should be carried out for at least once every 6 days, and 1-hour TSP monitoring should be done at least 3 times every 6 days while the highest dust impact is expected. The Action and Limit Levels of the air quality monitoring is provided in Appendix D.

Monitoring Equipment

3.1.2 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was performed using High Volume Sampler (HVS) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements of the EM&A Manual.

3.1.3 A portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring.

3.1.4 Brand and model of the equipment is given in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Brand and Model
High Volume Sampler (24-hour TSP)	Tisch Total Suspended Particulate Mass Flow Controlled High Volume Air Sampler (Model No. TE-5170)
Portable direct reading dust meter (1-hour TSP)	Sibata Digital Dust Monitor (Model No. LD-3)

Monitoring Locations

3.1.5 The monitoring station for construction dust monitoring pertinent to the Project has been identified based on the approved EM&A Manual for the Project. The location of the construction dust monitoring station is summarized in Table 3.2 and shown in Figure 3.1.

Table 3.2 Location of Construction Dust Monitoring Station

Location	Monitoring Station	Description
E-A14a^[1]	Block B of Merit Industrial Centre	Rooftop (13/F)

Note:

[1] The air monitoring station proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e. Wyler Gardens with ID: E-A14) was not available for impact dust monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was conducted at E-A14a as an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.

Monitoring Methodology

3.1.6 24-hour TSP Monitoring

(a) The HVS was installed in the vicinity of the air sensitive receivers. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS as far as practicable: -

(i) A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.

(ii) Two samplers should not be placed less than 2m apart from each other;

(iii) The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.

(iv) A minimum of 2 meters separation from walls, parapets and penthouse for rooftop sampler.

(v) A minimum of 2 meters separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required.

(vi) No furnace or incinerator flues nearby.

(vii) Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

(viii) The sampler was located more than 20 meters from any dripline.

(ix) Any wire fence and gate, required to protect the sampler, did not obstruct the monitoring process.

(x) Permission was obtained to set up the samplers and access to the monitoring station.

(xi) A secured supply of electricity was obtained to operate the sampler.

(b) Preparation of Filter Papers

(i) Glass fibre filters, G810 were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.

(ii) All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C; the relative humidity (RH) was < 50% and not variable by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH was 40%.

(iii) All filter papers were prepared and analysed by ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd., which is a HOKLAS accredited laboratory and has comprehensive quality assurance and quality control programmes.

(c) Field Monitoring

(i) The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.

(ii) The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.

(iii) The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.

(iv) The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.

(v) The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied was sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

(vi) Then the shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.

(vii) The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.

(viii) A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.

(ix) On site temperature and atmospheric pressure readings were taken and the flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m³/min, and complied with the range specified in the EM&A Manual (i.e. 0.6-1.7 m³/min).

(x) The programmable digital timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hrs, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.

(xi) The initial elapsed time was recorded.

(xii) At the end of sampling, on site temperature and atmospheric pressure readings were taken and the final flow rate of the HVS was checked and recorded.

(xiii) The final elapsed time was recorded.

(xiv) The sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.

(xv) It was then placed in a clean envelope and sealed.

(xvi) All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.

(xvii) Filters were then sent to ALS Technichem (HK) Pty Ltd. for analysis.

(d) Maintenance and Calibration

(i) The HVS and its accessories were maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.

(ii) HVSs were calibrated using TE-5025A Calibration Kit upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals.

(iii) Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVSs are provided in Appendix E.

3.1.7 1-hour TSP Monitoring

(a) Measuring Procedures

The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

(i) Turn the power on.

(ii) Close the air collecting opening cover.

(iii) Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG]

(iv) Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.

(v) Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.

(vi) Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.

(vii) Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.

(viii) Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.

(ix) Push the “TIME SETTING” switch the time set in the display to 3 hours.

(x) Lower down the air collection opening cover.

(xi) Push “START/STOP” switch to start measurement.

(b) Maintenance and Calibration

(i) The 1-hour TSP meter was calibrated at 1-year intervals against a continuous particulate TEOM Monitor, Series 1400ab. Calibration certificates of the Laser Dust Monitors are provided in Appendix E.

Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month

3.1.8 The schedule for environmental monitoring in March 2020 is provided in Appendix F.

3.2 Construction Noise Monitoring

Monitoring Requirements

3.2.1 In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact noise monitoring should be conducted for at least once a week during the construction phase of the Project. Table 3.3 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of impact noise monitoring. The Action and Limit Levels of the noise monitoring is provided in Appendix D.

Table 3.3 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Parameter and Duration	Frequency
30-mins measurement at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and L90 would be recorded.	At least once per week

Monitoring Equipment

3.2.2 Noise monitoring was performed using sound level meter at each designated monitoring station. The sound level meters deployed comply with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications (IEC) 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Acoustic calibrator was deployed to check the sound level meters at a known sound pressure level. Brand and model of the equipment is given in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4 Noise Monitoring Equipment for Regular Noise Monitoring

Equipment	Brand and Model
Integrated Sound Level Meter	B&K (Model No. 2238)
Acoustic Calibrator	B&K (Model No. 4231) MVI (Model No. CAL21)

Monitoring Locations

3.2.3 The monitoring stations for construction noise monitoring pertinent to the Project have been identified based on the approved EM&A Manual for the Project. Locations of the noise monitoring stations are summarized in Table 3.5 and shown in Figure 3.2.

Table 3.5 Noise Monitoring Stations during Construction Phase

Location	Monitoring Station	Description	Measurement
E-N12a ^[1]	19 Hing Yan Street	Rooftop (9/F)	Façade
E-N21a ^[1]	Block B of Merit Industrial Centre	Rooftop (13/F)	Free field ^[2]

Notes:

[1] The noise monitoring stations proposed in the EM&A Manual (i.e. Grand Waterfront Tower 3 with ID: E-N12 and Hang Chien Court Block J with ID: E-N21) were not available for impact noise monitoring, therefore impact monitoring was conducted at E-N12a and E-N21a as an alternative which was agreed by the ER, IEC and EPD.

[2] A correction of +3 dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.

Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

3.2.4 Table 3.6 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of impact noise monitoring.

Table 3.6 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Location	Parameter and Duration	Frequency
E-N12a and E-N21a	30-mins measurement at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays. Leq, L10 and L90 would be recorded.	At least once per week

Monitoring Methodology

3.2.5 Monitoring Procedure

(a) The sound level meter was set on a tripod at a height of 1.2 m above the ground.

(b) Façade measurement was made at E-N12a.

(c) Free field measurements was made at monitoring location E-N21a. A correction of +3 dB(A) shall be made to the free field measurements.

(d) The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

(e) Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

(i) frequency weighting: A

(ii) time weighting: Fast

(iii) time measurement: L_{eq(30-minutes)} during non-restricted hours i.e. 0700 – 1900 on normal weekdays.

(f) Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using the acoustic calibrator for 94 dB(A) at 1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB(A), the measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

(g) During the monitoring period, the L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ were recorded. In addition, site conditions and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

(h) Noise measurement was paused during periods of high intrusive noise (e.g. dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible. Observations were recorded when intrusive noise was unavoidable.

(i) Noise monitoring was cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10m/s.

3.2.6 Maintenance and Calibration

(a) The microphone head of the sound level meter was cleaned with soft cloth at regular intervals.

(b) The meter and calibrator were sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.

(c) Calibration certificates of the sound level meters and acoustic calibrators are provided in Appendix E.

Monitoring Schedule for the Reporting Month

3.2.7 The schedule for environmental monitoring in March 2020 is provided in Appendix F.

3.3 Landscape and Visual

3.3.1 As per the EM&A Manuals, the landscape and visual mitigation measures shall be implemented and site inspections should be undertaken once every two weeks during the construction period. A summary of the implementation status is presented in Section 6

4 Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures

4.1.1 The Contractor has implemented environmental mitigation measures and requirements as stated in the EIA Reports, the EP and EM&A Manuals. The implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures during the reporting period is summarized in Appendix C.
Status of required submissions under the EP during the reporting period is summarised in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 Status of Required Submission under Environmental Permit

EP Condition	Submission	Submission Date
Condition 3.4 of EP- 457/2013/C and Condition 3.4 of FEP-01/457/2013/C	Monthly EM&A Report for February 2020	13 March 2020

5 Monitoring Results

5.1 Construction Dust Monitoring

5.1.1 The monitoring results for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP are summarized in Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 respectively. Detailed air quality monitoring results and daily extract of meteorological observations are presented in Appendix G.

Table 5.1 Summary of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period

ID	Average (mg/m^3)	Range (mg/m^3)	Action Level (mg/m^3)	Limit Level (mg/m^3)
E-A14a	44.9	21.7 – 85.4	197.3	260

Table 5.2 Summary of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Result in the Reporting Period

ID	Average (mg/m^3)	Range (mg/m^3)	Action Level (mg/m^3)	Limit Level (mg/m^3)
E-A14a	63.1	57.4 – 68.1	302.4	500

5.1.2 No Action and Limit Level exceedance was recorded for 24-hour TSP monitoring at the monitoring location in the reporting month.

5.1.3 No Action and Limit Level exceedance was recorded for 1-hour TSP monitoring at the monitoring location in the reporting month.

5.1.4 The event and action plan is annexed in Appendix I.

5.1.5 Major dust sources during the monitoring included construction dust and nearby traffic emission.

5.2 Regular Construction Noise Monitoring

5.2.1 The monitoring results for noise are summarized in Table 5.3 and the monitoring data is provided in Appendix H.

Table 5.3 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period

ID	Range, dB(A), Leq (30 mins)	Limit Level, dB(A), Leq (30 mins)
E-N12a	66.1 – 67.5	75
E-N21a	63.9 – 68.3	75

5.2.2 No Action Level exceedance was recorded since no noise related complaint was received in the reporting month.

5.2.3 No Limit Level exceedance of noise was recorded at the monitoring station in the reporting month.

5.2.4 The event and action plan is annexed in Appendix I.

5.2.5 Major noise sources during the monitoring included construction noise from the Project site and nearby traffic noise.

5.3 Waste Management

5.3.1 C&D materials and wastes sorting were carried out on site. Receptacles were available for C&D wastes and general refuse collection.

5.3.2 According to the Contractor’s information, the concerned soil, which assessed under the updated Supplementary Contamination Assessment Report, had been excavated in August 2019. In order to minimize the potentially adverse environmental impacts arising for the handling of potentially contaminated materials, the following environmental mitigation measures are proposed during the course soil excavation, stockpiling and backfilling works:

l Excavation profiles must be properly designed and executed.

l Stockpiling site(s) shall be lined with impermeable sheeting and bunded. Stockpiles shall be fully covered by impermeable sheeting to reduce dust emission.

l Excavation and stockpiling should be carried out during dry season as far as possible to minimise potentially contaminated runoffs from the Concerned Soil.

l Regular site audit will be conducted under the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme to ensure the soil excavation, stockpiling and backfilling works are carried out in accordance with this report. Findings of the site audit will be presented in Table 6.1.

l The truck transferring Concerned Soil shall be covered entirely by impervious sheeting to ensure that the dusty materials do not leak from the truck.

5.3.3 As advised by the Contractor, Total 40,029 m³ of inert C&D material was generated, 5,784 m³ inert C&D material was disposed at the Public Fills, 34,245 m³ was reused in other contract in the reporting month. 33,740 kg general refuse was generated and sent to NENT Landfill in the reporting month. No paper/cardboard packaging, metals and plastics were collected by recycle contractor in the reporting month. No chemical waste was collected by licensed contractor in the reporting period. 6,496 m³ of Type 1, 8,543 m³ of Type 2 and no Type 3 Marine sediment were disposed at Confined Marine Disposal Facility to the East of Sha Chau. The waste flow table is annexed in Appendix K.

5.3.4 The Contractor is advised to properly maintain on site C&D materials and wastes collection, sorting and recording system and maximize reuse / recycle of C&D materials and wastes. The Contractor is reminded to properly maintain the site tidiness and dispose of the wastes accumulated on site regularly and properly.

5.3.5 The Contractor is reminded that chemical waste containers should be properly treated and stored temporarily in designated chemical waste storage area on site in accordance with the Code of Practise on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.

5.4 Landscape and Visual

5.4.1 Bi-weekly inspection of the implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures was conducted on 11 and 25 March 2020. A summary of the site inspection is provided in Appendix C. The observations and recommendations made during the site inspections are presented in Table 6.1.

6 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INSPECTION AND AUDIT

6.1.1 Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Project. A summary of the mitigation measures implementation schedule is provided in Appendix C.

6.1.2 In the reporting month, 4 site inspections were carried out on 4, 11, 18 and 25 March 2020. Joint inspections with the IEC, ER, the Contractor and the ET were conducted on 18 March 2020. In addition, no joint inspection with EPD, ER and the Contractor was conducted in March 2020 to check the compliance of the dumping permit condition. No non-compliance was recorded during the site inspection. Details of observations recorded during the site inspections are presented in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1 Observations and Recommendations of Site Audit

Parameters	Date	Observations and Recommendations	Follow-up
Air Quality	11 March 2020	· Exposed area at Kai Tak and Landing Step Area was observed to be dry. The Contractor was reminded to provide proper measure for dust suppression.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 13 Mar 2020.
Noise	18 March 2020	· Noise barrier was not observed around the operating air compressor at Ma Tau Kok. The Contractor was reminded to erect the movable noise barrier around the air compressor for noise screening.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 19 Mar 2020.
Water Quality	4 March 2020	· Refuse was observed floated near the seawall at Steel Platform. The Contractor was reminded to remove the refuse regularly.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 9 Mar 2020.
		Reminder: · The Contractor was reminded to improve the bunding of Landing Step Area to prevent muddy water seepage.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 5 Mar 2020.
		Reminder: · The Contractor was reminded to repair the damaged drip tray at the Steel Platform to maintain the effectiveness of oil interception.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 6 Mar 2020.
	11 March 2020	· Oil container was observed stored without drip tray at underpass of Kai Tak. The Contractor was reminded to provide secondary containment for chemicals to prevent accidental spillage.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 16 Mar 2020.
	18 March 2020	· Chemicals were observed stored without drip tray at Ma Tau Kok and Steel Platform. The Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for chemicals.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 23 Mar 2020.
		Reminder: · The Contractor was reminded to provide maintenance on the silt removal facilities to maintain the effectiveness of silt removal.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 21 Mar 2020.
	25 March 2020	· Chemicals were observed stored without drip tray at Kai Tak and Ma Tau Kok. The Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for chemical storage.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 27 Mar 2020.
		· Inadequate measure for controlling the splashy material during loading of barge was observed at the Steel Platform. The Contractor was reminded to improve the measure to prevent the material drop into the surrounding water.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 31 Mar 2020.
Waste/ Chemical Management	11 March 2020	· Accumulated waste was observed inside the receptacle at Steel Platform. The Contractor was reminded to remove the waste regularly to avoid waste accumulation.	The item was rectified by the Contractor on 13 Mar 2020.
Land Contamination	Nil	Nil	Nil
Landscape & Visual	Nil	Nil	Nil
Permits/ Licenses	Nil	Nil	Nil

6.1.3 All follow-up actions requested by Contractor's ET and IEC during the site inspection were undertaken as reported by the Contractor and confirmed in the following weekly site inspection conducted during the reporting period. No follow-up action requested by EPD during the site inspection in the reporting month.

6.2 Summary of Monitoring Exceedances

6.2.1 All 24-hour TSP result was below the Action and Limit Levels at all monitoring locations in the reporting month.

6.2.2 All 1-hour TSP result was below the Action and Limit Levels at all monitoring locations in the reporting month.

6.2.3 No Action Level exceedance was recorded since no noise related complaint was received in the reporting month.

6.2.4 No Limit Level exceedance for noise was recorded at all monitoring stations in the reporting month.

6.3 Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance

6.3.1 No environmental non-compliance was recorded in the reporting month.

6.4 Summary of Environmental Complaints

6.4.1 No notification of complaint were received in the reporting month. Cumulative statistics on notification of complaint is provided in Appendix J

6.5 Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecutions

6.5.1 No environmental related prosecution or notification of summons was received in the reporting month. Cumulative statistics on notification of summons and successful prosecutions is provided in Appendix J.

7 FUTURE KEY ISSUES

7.1 Construction Programme for the Next Three Month

7.1.1 The major construction works between April and June 2020 is provided in Table 7.1.

Table 7.1 Construction Activities in the coming three months

Locations	Site Activities
Kai Tak	· Base slab and wall, roof slab construction at underpass and depressed road; · Excavation and ELS installation at cut & cover tunnel, depressed road and underpass; · Temporary Grouting; · Backfilling works and ELS removal at Underpass
Ma Tau Kok	· TTM implementation; · Rock excavation; · ELS installation and Access platform concreting works; · Pipe piling works for cut and cover tunnel; · Laying of lighting ducts at Metered Carpark area; · Fresh water pipe installation works; · Covered walkway construction
Kowloon Bay	· Excavation for stage 1 underwater tunnel; · S3 - S7 ELS installation; · Temporary Grouting; · Pumping Test; · Blinding layer and base slab constrcution
Barging Point	· Barging point operation (Spoil Disposal)

7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

7.2.1 Potential environmental impacts arising from the above construction activities are mainly associated with construction dust, construction noise, and waste management.

7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

7.3.1 The tentative schedule for environmental monitoring in April 2020 is provided in Appendix F.

8 ConclusionS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Conclusions

8.1.1 24-hour TSP and noise monitoring were carried out in the reporting month.

8.1.2 All 24-hour TSP monitoring results complied with the Action / Limit Level at in the reporting month.

8.1.3 All 1-hour TSP result was below the Action and Limit Levels at all monitoring locations in the reporting month.

8.1.4 No Action Level exceedance was recorded since no noise related complaint was received in the reporting month.

8.1.5 No Limit Level exceedance for noise was recorded at all monitoring stations in the reporting month.

8.1.6 4 nos. of environmental site inspections and no site inspections with EPD were carried out in March 2020. Recommendations on remedial actions were given to the Contractor for the deficiencies identified during the site audit.

8.1.7 No notification of complaint, summons and successful prosecution were received in the reporting month.

8.2 Recommendations

8.2.1 According to the environmental site inspections performed in the reporting month, the following recommendations were provided:

Air Quality Impact

· The Contractor was reminded to provide proper measure for dust suppression.

Construction Noise Impact

· The Contractor was reminded to erect the movable noise barrier around the air compressor for noise screening.

Water Quality Impact

· The Contractor was reminded to remove the floating refuse regularly.

· The Contractor was reminded to improve the bunding along the site boundary to prevent muddy water seepage.

· The Contractor was reminded to provide a drip tray for chemicals to prevent the chemical spillage.

· The Contractor was reminded to provide maintenance on the silt removal facilities to maintain the effectiveness of silt removal.

· The Contractor was reminded to improve the measure to prevent the material drop into the surrounding water.

Chemical and Waste Management

· The Contractor was reminded to remove the refuse regularly to maintain the site tidiness.

Landscape & Visual Impact

· No specific observation was identified in the reporting month.

Permits/licenses

· No specific observation was identified in the reporting month.